The
No Flour, No Sugar Diet is written by Dr Peter
Gott - a popular health columnist and medical
practitioner. Subtitled "The Simplest Way to Lose
Weight", the book is based on a simple answer:
Eliminate all foods that are flour-based or contain
added sugars.
The book is currently sitting in
the bestseller lists - perhaps indicative of our
desire for a simple solution. The trouble is, a truly
simple solution wouldn't fill a book, and to fill up a
book, simple can become convoluted.
The
Basics
Eliminating flour and sugar effectively reduces the
amount of "empty" calories from your diet. Many of
these foods (based on refined carbohydrates) are also
high in fat (pizza, donuts, etc).
The premise is a
good one. Despite all the contrary dietary advice of
recent years - there does seem to be a growing
consensus about refined carbohydrates: We eat too much
of them and they provide us with little nutritive
value - not to mention the issue of glycemic response.
No Flour,
No Sugar addresses the
finer points of reading food labels (and determining
what is a flour or sugar). The book also gives a nod
to the value of exercise - suggesting half an hour a
day. In keeping with simplicity Dr Gott doesn't bother
with complex phases or waves - from
Day 1 you "simply" eliminate flours and sugars.
Inconsistencies
In Dr. Gott's introduction he mentions that "no one
wants to be bothered with counting calories" and "you
don't want to memorize daunting lists of food".
However as you progress through the book, you do
indeed come across daunting lists of food, and a
detailed chart of daily calorie requirements.
Like many diet
authors, Gott takes great pains to deride "fad diets",
and in particular low-carb diets. What is ironic here,
is that by reducing refined carbs (i.e. flour and
sugar) from your diet - you are, by default, embarking
on a form of a low or reduced carb diet. This is
unless you continue (or begin) to eat lots of rice or
potatoes (which are perfectly acceptable in this diet).
Practicality?
Simple in concept may not necessarily be simple in
execution. The No Flour, No Sugar Diet has 80 pages (almost
half the book) devoted to meal plans and recipes. Call
me cynical, but if the diet is as simple as dropping
flour and sugar, then why do we need loads of recipes?
For a person who
lives on pizza, bread rolls, and donuts - suddenly
eating Spiced Edamame and Vietnamese Shrimp Wraps (p.
101) may present something of a challenge.
Conclusion
If the average person removed flour and sugar-based
foods from their diet they would probably experience
weight loss. These kind of foods make a large part of
our modern diet, and, in my opinion, are at the root
of many health issues.
Gott has the right
premise, but fails to address behavioural issues - or
the reason why we eat the way we do. Those who are
already familiar with the basic mechanics of healthy
weight loss will find nothing new here. |